More billable capacity
Turn reclaimed hours into more cases
Every hour Navisa takes off file prep is an hour your team can spend on billable work. Take on more cases without hiring another coordinator.
AI file-prep engine for Canadian immigration firms
Turn every immigration file into a review-ready case package faster.
Navisa moves a case through intake, document collection, OCR, eligibility, consistency, NOC review, LOEs, IMM forms, package readiness, and AI Coach support while the consultant stays in control.
7 days free, including up to 5 trial cases.
1 filefrom intake to package readiness
32document types converted into case facts
11file-prep steps supported
Interactive product demoOpen full demo
Hundreds of hours back
Stop burning paid talent on repetitive prep
Intake cleanup, document chasing, PDF review, draft setup, and package checks move into one structured AI-assisted process: 3 to 6 hours back on a single file, hundreds across a year of cases.
Approval confidence protected
Find filing risk before it becomes rework
Eligibility issues, document contradictions, weak evidence, NOC gaps, outdated assumptions, and package blockers surface early.
Existing case lift
Do not wait for the next client to get value. Put every active case into Navisa.
Even if you are not adding many new files this month, your existing cases are already leaking time in document chasing, risk review, drafts, and package prep. Upload a spreadsheet of existing clients, bring active files into one workspace, and let Navisa surface the blockers across the cases already on your desk.
Import existing clients
Bring current case lists into Navisa from CSV or Excel, then start organizing the files your firm is already carrying.
Clean up in-progress files
Centralize checklist status, document gaps, extracted facts, findings, and next actions before the file reaches final review.
Protect revenue already booked
Catch blockers, weak evidence, and review spirals inside cases you have already sold instead of only optimizing future intake.
What one included case gets
Not generic software access. A full immigration file-prep process.
Each active case can move through the same connected preparation loop, from intake facts to final package blockers, so consultants review a prepared file instead of rebuilding the case from loose documents.
AI intake strategy
Status, work, education, language, family, admissibility, and pathway logic prepared for consultant review.
Client portal requests
Case-specific upload requests, checklist sync, and a cleaner path for clients to send the right evidence.
32 document-type extraction
Uploaded PDFs become structured case facts instead of another manual read-through queue.
Checklist and compliance sync
Missing, failed, weak, and review-needed evidence stays visible before final review time gets expensive.
Eligibility with citations
Canadian stream fit, hard gates, official references, and source-backed findings in one analysis surface.
Consistency review
Names, dates, employment history, status facts, and document claims are compared across the file.
NOC and reference letters
Duties, TEER, salary, hours, dates, signatory details, recency, and employer wording are checked.
Case-specific AI Coach
Answers use the client file, uploaded documents, checklist, open findings, and relevant official guidance.
LOE drafting
Findings and case facts become draft explanations the consultant can review, edit, and approve.
IMM form support
Form data preparation, blank-field review, consultant edits, and official-PDF readiness gates stay connected.
Evidence package readiness
IRCC-style slots, open blockers, approved work products, and final readiness status in one place.
The margin leak
Manual firms lose profit in a hundred tiny places.
Everyone has seen case management software. Navisa is different: it does the repetitive preparation work that keeps consultants trapped below their real case capacity, whether the file came in today or three months ago.
Firms that keep doing every intake, document review, draft, and package check manually will feel slower every month.
Your team chases documents across email, WhatsApp, portals, and random attachments.
With NavisaNavisa turns the checklist into client requests, collects uploads, and keeps every file tied to the right IRCC-style slot.
Consultants reread PDFs to find gaps, contradictions, weak evidence, and outdated assumptions.
With NavisaNavisa extracts facts, compares documents, cites policy, and ranks the blockers that deserve professional judgment first.
Drafting, form prep, and package assembly begin after the review, when the team is already behind.
With NavisaNavisa auto prepares application drafts, LOEs, reference-letter revisions, forms support, and readiness gates so review moves faster.
The automation engine
Upload one document. The whole prep pipeline runs itself.
Navisa is not a set of buttons a consultant has to remember to press. One upload triggers the entire file-prep chain, and each new fact re-runs the checks downstream, so the case keeps moving toward review.
One manual action. Everything below fires automatically.
A document lands
A consultant or the client uploads one file. That single upload is the only manual trigger Navisa needs.
Extraction fires
OCR reads the file and turns it into structured case facts across 32 document types, with no manual data entry.
Compliance and consistency run
The file is checked for policy compliance and cross-document contradictions the moment new facts arrive.
Eligibility re-analyzes
Stream fit, hard gates, and a cited eligibility read refresh against the updated file automatically.
NOC and letters update
Reference-letter and NOC duty checks re-run so employer wording problems surface without a manual pass.
Drafts and package prep queue
LOEs, form data, and package readiness move forward so the consultant reviews a prepared file, not a blank one.
01Intake
Pathway strategy prepared
02Documents
Client evidence organized
03Analysis
Risk and eligibility cited
04NOC
Reference letters tightened
05Drafting
Application drafts queued
06Package
Readiness blocked or cleared
Category clarity
Traditional case management tracks the file. Navisa works the file.
If Navisa is compared only as another case-management subscription, the value is easy to miss. The real comparison is against the file-prep work your team still has to do after the case is tracked.
Compared with
Typical job
What Navisa adds
Generic case management
Contacts, tasks, deadlines, notes, documents, and status.
Reads the immigration file, creates findings, prepares drafts, and blocks readiness until issues are visible.
Immigration form software
Questionnaires and form population.
Uses extracted facts, source-backed analysis, NOC review, LOEs, forms, and package blockers together.
Generic AI chat
Answers prompts without knowing the full client record unless someone pastes it in.
Answers with the case, documents, checklist, findings, and official-source retrieval already in context.
Manual coordinator work
Humans chase uploads, reread PDFs, spot gaps, create drafts, and assemble review packets by hand.
Moves repetitive file prep into a structured process so human judgment is spent where it matters.
Why not just use ChatGPT?
Generic AI gives you another task. Navisa gives you a prepared file.
A general chatbot does not know your client. You paste the file in, copy the answer out, and re-verify everything yourself, every time. That is more work, not less.
Generic AI chat
You assemble the client context by hand, every time Answers are not tied to the actual uploaded documents No citations you can defend to a client or an officer You re-check every claim yourself Nothing is saved back to the file Navisa
The case, documents, checklist, and findings are already in context Every answer is grounded in this specific client file Findings cite the regulatory section and the IRCC policy source Risk comes back as ranked, reviewable action items Everything stays on the case for the next stepOne adds a tool to manage. The other does the work and hands it back reviewed.
How Navisa creates leverage
One AI copilot across the work that usually slows the firm down.
This is not a collection of AI buttons. It is a connected case engine that keeps pushing each file toward a faster, cleaner, consultant-reviewed submission.
Faster intake
Turn messy intake into a case strategy you can review.
Capture status, work, education, language, family, and admissibility facts, then prepare the pathway logic before consultant time gets expensive.
CRS and stream fit Hard-gate eliminators Reviewable strategy
Less chasing
Give clients a clearer upload experience and your team fewer follow-ups.
Case-specific requests, secure portal uploads, OCR extraction, checklist sync, and document compliance stay connected from the first upload.
Client portal Extraction status Checklist mapping
More accuracy
Run a structured case review before the file reaches final review.
Eligibility, policy references, cross-document consistency, filing context, and source freshness checks turn risk into visible action items.
Official citations Source checks Finding owners
Fewer weak letters
Repair reference letters before they become refusal fuel.
Navisa checks duties, TEER, recency, salary, hours, employment dates, signatory contact, and missing employer wording.
NOC duty fit Compliance fixes Employer-ready text
Faster submission prep
Auto prepare the filing work so consultants review instead of rebuild.
LOEs, reference-letter drafts, form worksheets, official-PDF gates, IRCC-style upload slots, and readiness banners keep the case moving.
LOE drafting IMM form gates Evidence package
Accuracy engine
Increase approval confidence by finding the issue while there is still time to fix it.
Navisa does not promise outcomes. It runs a structured, cited review, an IRAC-style eligibility memo, cross-document consistency, and NOC checks, with each finding backed by the regulatory section and the IRCC policy source, so risk, weak evidence, and readiness blockers surface before the file becomes expensive to repair.
Misrepresentation conflicts
Employment dates, names, document facts, and status history are compared across uploads so contradictions surface early.
Flagged: letter says March 2019, tax slip starts 2020
NOC mismatch
Reference letters are checked against selected NOC duties and TEER expectations before the employer revision cycle starts.
Missing: duties, salary, hours, exact dates, signatory contact
Expired or missing evidence
Checklist slots, document expiry, extraction failures, and weak evidence claims are visible before review time is wasted.
Blocked: police certificate absent, IELTS near expiry
Package readiness blockers
Open high-risk findings, unapproved LOEs, missing forms, and unvalidated PDFs keep the package from looking submission-ready.
Do not submit: IMM 5476 not approved, gap LOE pending
Living case intelligence
Keep case confidence alive after intake.
Navisa keeps each active file review-ready as facts, public guidance, filing context, and client documents change. It is decision support built for firms that cannot afford outdated assumptions.
Case review statusConsultant-reviewed file state
Live
Key facts match current guidance
The selected pathway passes captured gates, filing context, and available public guidance checks.
Viable, but consultant attention needed
Missing facts, unclear guidance, or conditional rules keep the pathway in professional review.
Official guidance may need another look
A case is marked for review when important public guidance or filing assumptions may need another look.
Hard conflicts block clean readiness
Closed streams, deterministic gate failures, or mismatched filing context are surfaced before downstream work proceeds.
CRS and stream signals
Express Entry cutoffs, stream status, and relevant public updates are compared against the client file when available.
Official-source checks
Important public guidance can move a case into review instead of letting an old assumption look clean.
NOC and filing context
Location, application basis, TEER, NOC, and permit context keep forms, checklists, and strategy from drifting.
Change alerts
When relevant public guidance changes, Navisa can surface the affected case, the reason, and the source that needs review.
01
Intake completed
02
Current sources checked
03
CRS and stream updates checked
04
Review alert created if guidance changes
05
Consultant reviews and reruns analysis
Work product acceleration
Auto prepare the work so consultants review and submit faster.
Navisa turns case facts and findings into review-ready outputs: case-specific answers, reference-letter fixes, LOE context, form support, and package readiness.
Cited legal analysis
A cited eligibility read, not a chatbot guess.
Eligibility, hard gates, cross-document consistency, and NOC fit come back as an IRAC-style memo, every finding backed by the regulatory section and the IRCC policy source behind it.
Case-specific AI copilot
Ask about this client, not immigration in general.
The coach answers with case facts, open findings, uploaded documents, checklist status, and retrieved policy context in the loop.
Review-ready employer letters
Turn weak employer letters into precise revision requests.
Show NOC fit, missing duties, compliance gaps, consultant overrides, and employer-ready wording without burying the issue.
Package confidence
Know what blocks filing before anyone clicks submit.
IRCC-style upload slots, approved work products, forms, missing evidence, and readiness status stay in one final review surface.
IRCC form auto-fill
Stop re-typing the same client facts into every IMM form.
Navisa pre-fills the official IRCC forms from the facts it already pulled out of the file, then flags the blanks you still need to complete. You review, edit, and export the official PDF, ready to open and validate in Adobe Reader.
Official IRCC forms, never replicas Pre-filled from facts already extracted from the file Guided review of the blanks you still need to complete Official PDF output that opens and validates in Adobe Reader
Better client experience
Clients feel guided. Your team stops playing document traffic controller.
A faster firm is not only faster internally. Clients get clearer requests, fewer confused back-and-forth loops, and a cleaner sense of where their file stands.
Clients know what to upload
Navisa turns case requirements into clearer document requests, so your team spends less time translating checklist language.
Fewer status-update loops
Checklist status, missing evidence, draft readiness, and package blockers become visible instead of trapped in someone's inbox.
Cleaner files reach review
Extraction, compliance checks, and readiness gates mean consultants review a prepared file, not a loose pile of documents.
Client-completed intake
Send the intake to your client. Get back a structured strategy.
You do not have to interview every client yourself to get a clean start. Send a secure intake link, let the client complete their own profile, and Navisa turns it into a pathway strategy you review.
01
Send a secure intake link
Instead of interviewing every client yourself, send a branded intake link in one click.
02
The client completes it themselves
Status, work, education, language, family, and admissibility details, captured in the client's own time.
03
A reviewable strategy lands
Navisa turns the answers into a pathway strategy for your review and notifies you the moment it is ready.
Official-source retrieval and visible citations
Firm-isolated document and case handling
Cases can be re-checked as public guidance changes
Case-specific AI Coach, not generic prompting
Practice economics
Compare Navisa against the manual work still happening after a case is created.
The real question is not whether another subscription is affordable. It is what your firm could bill if the 3 to 6 hours of prep on every file, hundreds of hours across a year, went back to your team as capacity for more cases instead of repeated manual work.
Manual file-prep cost check
If a coordinator or paralegal spends 3-6 hours preparing a case, that time has a real monthly cost.
3 hoursintake cleanup, document chasing, and checklist matching
4 hoursPDF review, fact extraction, gap notes, and consultant handoff
6 hoursrework after weak evidence, NOC gaps, or final package blockers
Reclaimed prep hours become capacity. Taking on additional signed files matters far more than shaving a few dollars off software spend.
Weak letters, contradictions, missing evidence, and outdated assumptions are cheaper to catch early.
Consultants spend more time reviewing judgment calls and less time reconstructing what happened in the file.
Pricing
One simple plan. Pay for the files you actually prepare.
Every account includes the AI Coach, intake support, document extraction, eligibility review, NOC help, drafting support, and package readiness — no case limit.
Most consultants charge $2,000–$5,500 per file.Navisa is $35 per case — it pays for itself on your very first file, then saves 6–8 hours on every one after.
Base plan
From $45/mo
$45/mo USD
Billed $540/yr — 2 months free vs monthly.
Includes unlimited team seats and full access to everything below.
Start free trialWatch demoPer case
$35/case USD
Charged once when you create a case — full AI preparation end to end. Active cases only: closed files never charge again. No seat fees, ever.
Your first 5 cases are free — no card charged during the 7-day trial. 30-day money-back guarantee.
Included with every account
Existing case import AI intake and pathway strategy Official-source freshness checks Document extraction and compliance Client upload portal Eligibility analysis with citations Cross-document consistency checks NOC and reference-letter intelligence AI Coach LOE drafting IMM form support Evidence package readiness
Trust first
Questions serious consultants will ask.
Because the value is created on active files, not passive software access. The per-case fee covers the full AI preparation of that file — intake, document extraction, eligibility, consistency, NOC review, AI Coach, drafting, forms, and package readiness. The base plan (unlimited seats included) keeps your firm set up between files. Pricing shows in your local currency above.
The next firm to scale will not do it by hiring coordinators for every bottleneck.
Run real files through intake, documents, analysis, drafts, forms, and package readiness. Trial includes up to 5 cases, and the value should be obvious before the trial ends.