Cost comparison
Three real options, three different price points, three different things you actually get for the money. A straight, cited comparison — not a sales pitch for any one of them.
CanadaVisa+ is free and scores eligibility across 40+ programs, but does not extract documents, cite the regulation behind a result, or pre-fill IRCC forms. Navisa Prep is $21 one-time (plus an optional $8/mocompanion) and does all three, with every result traced to its source. A full-service RCIC retainer for Express Entry commonly runs $2,500–$3,500 and is the only option of the three where a licensed professional actually represents you.
| What you get | CanadaVisa+ | Navisa Prep | Full-service RCIC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | $21 one-time | $2,500 – $5,500+ |
| Eligibility scoring | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Document extraction | No | Yes | Manual (by the RCIC) |
| Cited to regulation/source | No | Yes | Varies by RCIC |
| IRCC form pre-fill | No | Yes | Done for you |
| Licensed representation | No | No — connects to one via Navisa Relay | Yes |
Last updated 2026-07-21. Pricing shown for your region; see the note below each figure for its source.
Fee ranges below come from a dedicated RCIC fee guide (ImmiMentor, published April 2026). They are broadly consistent with independent reporting on typical Canadian immigration consultant pricing. Actual fees vary by consultant, by complexity, and by whether any refusals are already on file. Always get the exact fee in writing before signing a retainer.
| Service | Typical range (CAD) |
|---|---|
| Initial consultation (30–60 min) | $100 – $250 |
| Express Entry / FSW / CEC / FST | $2,500 – $3,500 |
| PNP (provincial portion only) | $2,500 – $3,500 |
| PNP + federal application | $4,500 – $5,500 |
| Spousal sponsorship | $2,500 – $3,500 |
A reputable RCIC bills government and IRCC fees through to you at cost, separate from their professional fee. Ask for that breakdown in writing before paying anything.
CanadaVisa+ — free
Eligibility scoring across 40+ programs and 150+ historical drawsDocument extraction or verificationCitations to the regulation behind a resultIRCC form pre-fillNavisa Prep — $21 one-time
Eligibility scoring against every published criterionDocument extraction and cross-document consistency checksEvery result cited to its regulatory or IRCC sourceIRCC form pre-fill from your entered factsLegal advice or representation — Prep never represents youFull-service RCIC — $2,500+
A licensed professional who can advise and represent youJudgment on discretionary or borderline criteriaSomeone accountable to the CICC for the workA fixed, predictable price — varies by consultant and complexityCanadaVisa+ fits someone who only wants a rough eligibility check before deciding whether to invest more time or money.
Navisa Prep fits someone preparing their own straightforward application who wants documents checked, cited, and pre-filled. It avoids a full retainer on a case with no unusual complications.
A full-service RCIC fits a case with real complexity. Prior refusals, inadmissibility questions, and discretionary PNP streams all qualify, as does anything needing a licensed professional's judgment rather than organization. See when to prepare your own application vs. hiring a consultant for the fuller breakdown.
Start free — the $21 unlock only applies when you're ready to build your full application package. If your case turns out to need a licensed professional, Navisa Relay connects you to one with your organized file already in hand.
Navisa Prep is document-preparation software for individuals — cited comparisons and options, never advice. The Navisa platform is the case engine for licensed firms.
Navisa Prep is document-preparation software. It is not a lawyer, RCIC, or immigration representative, does not provide legal advice, and does not guarantee any outcome. RCIC fee ranges are third-party estimates, not a quote from any specific consultant — always confirm the exact fee in writing before signing a retainer. CanadaVisa+ and RCIC pricing may change without notice; verify directly before relying on the figures above.